November 2009

Personalized Pens

At that time they were written in Hebrew dialects with bird feathers or quills. After the fall of the Roman Empire, Europeans had difficultly in obtaining reeds and began to use quills. There is a specific reference to quills in the writings of St. Isidore of Seville in the 7th century. Quill pens were used until the nineteenth century.

In the 1960s the fibre, or felt-tipped pen was invented by Yukio Horie of the Tokyo Stationery Company, Japan. Papermate's Flair was among the first felt-tip pens to hit the U.S. market in the 1960s, and it has been the leader ever since. Marker pens and highlighters, both similar to felt pens, have become popular in recent years.

Personalized Pens

Czech court lifts last legal hurdle to EU treaty

PRAGUE – A Czech court struck down a complaint against the EU reform treaty on Tuesday, removing the proposed charter's last legal hurdle and intensifying pressure on President Vaclav Klaus to sign it.
The Constitutional Court's chief judge, Pavel Rychetsky, said the Lisbon Treaty, which has already been ratified by other member nations, "does not violate the (Czech) constitution."
At the end of the ruling, whose reading took almost two hours, Rychetsky said all formal obstacles for ratification "are removed."
Klaus is the last obstacle to the full ratification of the treaty, which is designed to transform Europe into a more unified and powerful global player. The charter, which was bogged down in negotiations for almost a decade, has been ratified by all other 26 EU nations.
In Brussels, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said he was "extremely pleased" with the verdict.
"Together with the commitments given by all member states to the Czech government at the European Council last week, I believe that no further unnecessary delays should prevent the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty," Barroso said.
"I hope that we can now move forward as quickly as possible on the nomination of the president of the European Council and vice president of the Commission High Representative," he said, referring to the newly-created post of president, who will chair EU summits, and the bloc's new foreign policy chief, who will represent the EU abroad.
"The decision clears the way for President Vaclav Klaus to sign and finalize the ratification of the treaty and I am very confident he will do so," said Jerzy Buzek, president of the European Parliament. "The Treaty of Lisbon should now enter into force by the end of the year."
Klaus was awaiting the Brno-based court's ruling before deciding whether to endorse the treaty. It is not clear when that could happen.
Prime Minister Jan Fischer welcomed the verdict.
"The last hurdle has been cleared," Fischer said in a statement. He said he now expects Klaus to sign the treaty. He previously said he hoped Klaus could do that by the end of the year.
The court was asked to rule by a group of senators who filed a motion arguing the treaty was not in line with the constitution. Last year, the court dismissed a similar complaint.
Failure of the treaty would send the EU into an unprecedented crisis. Negotiators say its reforms — creating a new EU president post, giving more power to the foreign policy chief and streamlining EU decision-making — are needed to make the EU more effective.
Last week, EU leaders agreed to Klaus' last-minute demand — an opt-out from the treaty's Charter of Fundamental Rights in return for his signing of it. Klaus said he was not planning to make any further demands.
The Czech leader asked for the option over worries of property claims by ethnic Germans stripped of their land and expelled after World War II.
But it was considered Klaus had used the demand for the opt-out to try to scuttle ratification of the treaty, which he opposes. He fears the treaty would hand over too many national powers to EU institutions in Brussels.
Both houses of the Czech Parliament already have ratified the treaty.
___

Associated Press writers Robert Wielaard and Constant Brand in Brussels contributed to this report.

AP sources: House health bill totals $1.2 trillion

WASHINGTON – The health care bill headed for a vote in the House this week costs $1.2 trillion or more over a decade, according to numerous Democratic officials and figures contained in an analysis by congressional budget experts, far higher than the $900 billion cited by President Barack Obama as a price tag for his reform plan.
While the Congressional Budget Office has put the cost of expanding coverage in the legislation at roughly $1 trillion, Democrats added billions more on higher spending for public health, a reinsurance program to hold down retiree health costs, payments for preventive services and more.
Many of the additions are designed to improve benefits or ease access to coverage in government programs. The officials who provided overall cost estimates did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss them.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has referred repeatedly to the bill's net cost of $894 billion over a decade for coverage.
Asked about the higher estimate, Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said the measure not only insures 36 million more Americans, it provides critical health insurance reform in a way that is fiscally sound.
"It will not add one dime to the deficit. In fact, the CBO said last week that it will reduce the deficit both in the first 10 years and in the second 10 years," Daly said.
Democrats have been intent on passing legislation this year to implement Obama's call for expanded coverage for millions, curbs on industry abuses and provisions to slow the rate of growth of health care costs nationally.
"Now, add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years," the president said in a nationally televised speech in early September.
Whatever the final cost of legislation, the calendar is working increasingly against the White House and Democrats. While a House vote is possible late this week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., may not be able to begin debate on the issue until the week before Thanksgiving. Additionally, the Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has hinted at efforts to extend the debate for weeks if not months, a timetable that could extend into 2010.
One casualty of the time crunch and threatened Republican delaying tactics may be formal House-Senate negotiations on a final compromise. An alternative is a less formal hurry-up final negotiation involving the White House and senior Democrats.
Pelosi and her lieutenants worked on last-minute changes in the measure to ease concerns among opponents of abortion and a contentious provision relating to illegal immigrants. Conservative Democrats have expressed concern about the cost of the bill, and an evening closed-door meeting gave the leadership its first chance to hear their response.
The bill includes an option for a government-run health plan.
The leadership can afford more than two dozen defections and still be assured of the votes to prevail on the bill, one of the most sweeping measures in recent years.
Republicans put the cost of the bill at nearly $1.3 trillion.
"Our goal is to make it as difficult as possible for" Democrats to pass it, House Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said at a news conference. "We believe it is the wrong prescription."
One day after announcing Republicans would have an alternative measure, Boehner offered few details. He said it would omit one of the central provisions in Democratic bills — a ban on the insurance industry's practice of denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions. Instead, he said the Republicans would encourage creation of insurance pools for high-risk individuals and take other steps to ease their access to coverage.
Boehner also said Republicans would propose limits on medical malpractice lawsuits in what he said was an attempt to reduce the cost of coverage.
Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., the third-ranking leader, said that Democrats looked at their bill as a way to advance universal coverage. In contrast, he said, Republicans "believe the real issue back home is cost" of insurance, and said their alternative would be designed to tackle it.

Democrats have made elimination of the industry's practice a linchpin of their drive to overhaul the health care system. The industry has said it would not fight the change, and an accompanying restriction on its ability to charge higher premiums for certain groups, as the legislation includes a requirement for individuals to purchase insurance. Lacking that, the industry says millions of relatively healthy individuals would refuse to pay for coverage until they became sick, and the cost of premiums would rise sharply for everyone else.

Republicans oppose any government requirements for individuals to purchase insurance or for businesses to provide coverage.

The Congressional Budget Office is seen by lawmakers as the arbiter of claims about the costs and effects of proposed legislation, and the agency has been under intense pressure in recent weeks to compete assessments on several bills circulating in House and Senate.

In a letter last week, the agency's director, Dr. Douglas Elmendorf, said the net cost of expanding coverage in the House measure was estimated at $894 billion over 10 years, a figure reflecting a gross total of $1 trillion in federal subsidies as well as other spending.

The letter contained no similar assessment for the balance of the legislation and it was not clear when or whether one would be forthcoming.

In a letter last week to Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., on the general subject of health care, Elmendorf cautioned that some provisions in legislation have elements that raise costs and elements that lower costs.

"Tabulating all of the aspects of the proposal that would, in isolation, increase federal outlays would be complicated and would require somewhat arbitrary judgments" about calculating overall costs, Elmendorf said.

Ancient Civilization Cut Path to Demise (LiveScience.com)

The ancient South American Nasca civilization may have
caused its own demise by clear-cutting huge swaths of forest, a new study has
found.

The civilization disappeared mysteriously around 1,500 years
ago, after apparently prospering during the first half of the first millennium
A.D. in the valleys of south coastal Peru. Scientists have previously
suggested a massive El Niño event
disrupted the climate and caused the Nasca's demise, but new research suggests
that deforestation
may have also played an important role.

The Nasca are best known for leaving behind large geoglyphs
called Nazca lines carved into the surface of the vast, empty desert plain that
lies between the Peruvian towns
of Nazca and Palpa. Though the lines have spawned many interpretations, including
the suggestion that they were created by aliens, most scholars now think they
were sacred pathways that Nasca people followed during their ancient rituals.
The enigmatic society that once flourished apparently collapsed around 500 A.D.
after a bloody resource war. To investigate this event a team of archaeologists
led by David Beresford-Jones from the McDonald Institute for Archaeological
Research at the U.K.'s Cambridge University
gathered plant remains in the lower Ica
Valley. Based on this
evidence and pollen samples collected by co-researcher Alex Chepstow-Lusty of
the French Institute of Andean Studies in Lima,
the scientists found that the Nasca cleared huge areas of forest to make way
for agriculture. The native huarango tree, which once covered what is now a
desert area, was gradually replaced by crops such as cotton and maize.
This vital tree was a crucial part of the desert's fragile ecosystem, serving
to enhance soil fertility and moisture and help hold the Nasca's narrow,
vulnerable irrigation
channels in place.
Eventually, the people cut down so many trees that they reached a tipping point
at which the arid ecosystem was irreversibly damaged, the researchers found. At
this point a major El Niño event likely occurred, triggering floods made
much worse by the lack of forests that used to protect the delicate desert
ecology.

"These were very particular forests," Beresford-Jones
said. "The huarango is a remarkable nitrogen-fixing tree and it was an
important source of food, forage, timber and fuel for the local people.
Furthermore, it is the ecological 'keystone' species in this desert zone,
enhancing soil fertility and moisture, ameliorating desert extremes in the
microclimate beneath its canopy and underpinning the floodplain with one of the
deepest root systems of any tree known. In time, gradual woodland clearance
crossed an ecological threshold - sharply defined in such desert environments -
exposing the landscape to the region's extraordinary desert winds and the
effects of El Niño floods."
Without the huarango cover, when El Niño did strike, the river down-cut into
its floodplain, Nasca irrigation systems were damaged and the area became
unworkable for agriculture. This finding fits with other evidence that shows
that the generations that came afterwards did not fare as well as their
predecessors: infant mortality rose, while average adult life expectancy fell.
The crops cultivated by their ancestors disappeared in the lower Ica Valley
and the area was probably afflicted by a severe drought.

The research also stresses the importance of huarango
woodlands for sustaining livelihoods and creating fertile areas in these
environments. There are now no undisturbed ecosystems in the region and what
remains of the old-growth huarango forests is being destroyed in illegal
charcoal-burning operations.
"The mistakes of prehistory offer us important lessons for our management
of fragile, arid areas in the present," said co-author Oliver Whaley of the
Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew,
England.

The new study is detailed in the journal Latin American
Antiquity.

Earth
Checkup: 10 Health Status Signs

History's
Most Overlooked Mysteries

Quiz: The
Artifact Wars

Original Story: Ancient Civilization Cut Path to DemiseLiveScience.com chronicles the daily advances and innovations made in science and technology. We take on the misconceptions that often pop up around scientific discoveries and deliver short, provocative explanations with a certain wit and style. Check out our science videos, Trivia & Quizzes and Top 10s. Join our community to debate hot-button issues like stem cells, climate change and evolution. You can also sign up for free newsletters, register for RSS feeds and get cool gadgets at the LiveScience Store.

Richards, Carter score two each for Flyers in win

PHILADELPHIA – Mike Richards and Jeff Carter scored two goals apiece and rookie David Laliberte and Scott Hartnell also tallied, leading the Philadelphia Flyers to a 6-2 win over the Tampa Bay Lightning on Monday night.
The Flyers' excitement over their victory was offset by the news that star winger Simon Gagne will miss six to eight weeks. He is scheduled to have hernia and hip surgery on Tuesday.
Without Gagne, who has one goal and four assists this season, the Flyers peppered Lightning goalie Antero Niittymaki, scoring two goals in the first period, three in the second and one in the third.
Steven Stamkos and James Halpern scored for Tampa Bay.
The Flyers (7-4-1) have scored 12 goals in the past two games, and won for the fourth time in the past six. Goalie Ray Emery stopped 26 shots.
Despite leading the team in goals this season, Richards had gone six games without scoring. His first goal came off a feed from Chris Pronger, who corralled a bouncing puck. Hartnell assisted on Richards' second score. Carter had gone seven games without scoring.
Laliberte, recalled from the AHL Philadelphia Phantoms last week to replace Gagne, become the first Flyer to score in his first two NHL games since Eric Lindros on Oct. 6 and 9, 1992. He's the fifth to do that in Flyers franchise history.
Stamkos scored the first goal for Tampa Bay (4-4-4), capitalizing on a Danny Syvret turnover. Halpern netted the second, late in the third period. The Lightning have lost three of four.
NOTES: The Flyers have scored the first goal in 10 of their past 12 games. ... Pronger has recorded at least one point in eight straight games. ... Carter has played in 225 straight regular-season games.

Critics: Financial oversight council only tough on paper (McClatchy Newspapers)

WASHINGTON — A plan by congressional Democrats and the White House to curb future bad behavior on Wall Street would fail to resolve the bureaucratic infighting that helped bring about the global financial crisis, critics warn.

Congress this week begins considering legislation designed to ensure that never again are federal bank regulators asleep at the switch, as they were before the 2008 financial meltdown. To that end, the bill before the House Financial Services Committee would create a Council of Regulators , headed by the Treasury secretary.

The seven federal regulators who'd be the voting members of this council collectively would be charged with determining when an investment bank, hedge fund or other type of financial firm posed a risk to the broader financial system.

The Federal Reserve would be charged with monitoring risks in the largest financial firms that commonly are considered "too big to fail" without harming the global financial system.

Most analysts see the need for much closer supervision, but some critics argue that, as written, the legislation would transfer important supervisory powers away from the independent Fed and create a council that's tough only on paper.

"Terrible idea! It's an awful idea . . . it's just folly, just idiotic," said Laurence Meyer , a normally soft-spoken former Fed governor and a highly regarded economic forecaster.

Meyer rarely speaks harshly, but thinks it's a big mistake to create an inter-agency committee comprised of regulators with differing missions, turf to protect and a mutual lack of respect — and then ask them to forge common policy.

"If you really want to have improved supervision, you give it to supervisors and regulators. You are playing with fire here," said Meyer, who was a Fed governor from 1996 to 2002.

Meyer fears that Congress , in trying to punish the Fed for not preventing the recent crisis, actually may create more inter-agency squabbling than existed in the run- up to the crisis, when individual regulators saw portions of the problems but failed to work together to prevent the crisis from exploding.

Douglas Elliot also questions the approach. A former Wall Street investment banker, Elliot is now a researcher at the Brookings Institution , a center-left policy research center. Like Meyer, he worries that the well-intended council effort may create more bureaucracy.

"In terms of dealing with more subjective systemic-risk type issues, I really doubt that you can have that many people find sufficient agreement on something so difficult" as determining when a financial institution poses risks to the broader financial system, he said.

The nine-member council may not be nimble enough to do anything about accumulating risks, such as when stock prices or home prices become inflated and large financial institutions grow more exposed to asset deflation, he said.

"It's always very difficult to act against a bubble: A committee of bureaucrats doing it? I don't see it happening. Bubbles are politically popular, they are always going to happen," said Elliot, a former executive for almost 20 years at what today is J.P. Morgan Chase.

For example, he said, there was plenty of concern expressed about rising home prices before they eventually triggered the worst financial meltdown since the Great Depression.

"It's hard to imagine the Fed stepping forward, say in 2005, and trying hard to stop the housing bubble. They might have tried, but they would have been backed off pretty hard by the political sector," Elliot said.

Other critics, such as Vincent Reinhart , a former top Fed economist, argue that the council should be headed by an independent, presidentially appointed chairman — perhaps one confirmed by the Senate — someone who isn't protecting turf.

Otherwise, he warned, "It doesn't create the right incentives to operate" properly.

That view's shared by Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair .

"This would provide additional independence for the chairman and enable the chairman to focus full time on attending to the affairs of the council and supervising council staff," Bair said in prepared remarks to Congress last week.

As proposed, the council's members would include the Fed chairman, the FDIC chairman, the Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, the comptroller of the currency, the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission , the head of the National Credit Union Administration and the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency . A state banking supervisor and a state insurance commissioner each also would have a seat on the council, but as non-voting members.

ON THE WEB

Frank's legislation

Bair testimony

Elliot paper

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

To ask a question about this story or any economic question, go to McClatchy's economy Q&A

How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash

Goldman takes on new role: taking away people's homes

Mortgage crisis shows why financial regulation is needed